Últimas Noticias
Home » FfD » Intervention LATINDADD in session on Financing for Development United Nations
Intervention LATINDADD in session on Financing for Development United Nations

Intervention LATINDADD in session on Financing for Development United Nations


Private Finance Session

Patricia Miranda, November 13th 2014

Thank you Mr. Chairman,

During these days we have heard from several speakers that some MDGs have been reached, which is good news, and also that “the money is there” for post 2015, very promissing. But at the same time we have heard projections of deceleration in some economies, rise of debt, less ODA and big challenges to change international financial and tax systems. Given this outlook, can it be inferred that this available money will come from the private sector?

From the ground we are aware that our countries’ public resources are not enough and private sector involvement is important for job creation and tax contribution, among others, but at the same time we think that measures should be taken in order to guarantee a contribution to an inclusive and sustainable development.

Our concern relies on the type of development that private sector can contribute to, speaking not only about quantity but qualilty. Some examples to explain our concern are related to an increased foreign direct investment in Latin America but explained mainly for the high profitability rate of the extractive industries, intensive in capital but not in job creation, moreover when these flows are actually reinvested profits and not new resources to generate new jobs. According to ECLAC,  in the country with the highest profitability rate in the region (18%), only 1 direct job is created for every million dollar of FDI.

This attraction to natural resources is also deepening an economy based on commodities where several countries are sunk and it is not contributing to diversify the productive matrix.

In the other hand we have infrastructure megaprojects in energy, financed in several cases with private investment,  and leveraged by extenal debt, resources from Development Financial Institutions (DFIs) or through Public Private Partnerships (PPP)s. In these examples there are in addition social and environmental negative impacts, with initiatives that geographically are overlapping protected areas and indigenous people communities with the risk of vulnerating human rights.

There certainly are valuable private initiatives, but our main concerns address to these kind of examples, so I would like to ask what proposals there are to guarantee that private investment effectively contributes to a sustainable development and to poverty and inequality reduction. From our analysis, please allow me to put on the table some of our recommendations.

–  To develop a common set of responsible investment principles for sustainble development with a strong link to human rights.

– ODA resources should not leverage private investment, and if this was the case, should be implemented under the aid effectiveness principles.

– DFIs financing to private sector should keep high safegards standards.

– Regarding PPPs it is important to set a regulation framework to allow developing countries to address a cautious approach in order not to select the more expensive and risky option, with few benefits or higher costs for the people.

– Finally, UN member states can lead the establishment of accountabilliity processes and impact assessments.

Thank you very much.

One comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *